Libraries have always adapted and grown with their communities, yet some things still seem set in stone. Take for example our stance of “neutral,” which is used in most professional codes of ethics. The idea that we are neutral, or passively catering to every idea out there can evoke rage in even the most mild-mannered patrons and librarians.
However, I’ve always argued that neutral in the library context doesn’t mean what it first appears to mean.
So while the meaning is still valid today, it’s not clearly communicated. The language and terminology we use to describe ourselves should better reflect what we stand for. I’ll admit, I don’t have any bright ideas. Communications is not my speciality. However, I did see one possible idea posted on Twitter during the American Library Association conference this year. What do you think?
Presenters referring to the library as a “trusted space”. I like that better than “neutral” or “safe” – it implies a responsibility on our end to actively uphold that trust, instead of a passive role. #alaac18
— Audrey Barbakoff (@The_Bookaneer) June 23, 2018